MagicDraw UML and SysML Plugin eSchool
Motto: "Learn good ways to work with MagicDraw UML and its SysML Plugin !"
About the eSchool
UML2 in MagicDraw
MagicDraw UML tips
MagicDraw SysML Plugin
MagicDraw for Java
MagicDraw for XML
Advanced UML and SysML Training
  • MagicDraw UML, SysML, DoDaf, etc., training courses by No Magic. Please click here
Home » OMG SysML issues » Annex B: Sample Problem

TODO: Figure B.25: Why are the flowports typed by FuelFlow <<FlowSpecification>> never used ?

Mon, 06/02/2008 - 14:45 — author

In Figure B.23 - Elaborating Definition of Fuel Flow (Power Subsystem Fuel Flow Definition) ice:InternalCombustionEngine has a non-conjugated FlowPort of type FuelFlow <<FlowSpecification>>, and ft:FuelTankAssembly has a conjugated FlowPort of type FuelFlow <<FlowSpecification>>, however in Figure B.25 - Detailed Internal Structure of Fuel Delivery Subsystem (Fuel Distribution Detail) only ice:InternalCombustionEngine has an 'inout' FlowPort of type Fuel , and ft:FuelTankAssembly has two separate atomic flowports p1:Fuel 'out' and p2:Fuel 'in' for the supply and return lines respectively.

Why are the flow ports with flow specifications introduced then never used (except in a parametric diagram Figure B.24) ?

‹ TODO: Figure B.23: The sense of direction seems the wrong way round in the Block flow properties and FlowSpecificationupTODO: Figure B.26: GlobalTime not clearly defined ›
Search
The MagicDraw SysML Plugin Tutorial Overview